Premises

To say I fully believe with the rationality premise, the perfectibility premise, and the mutability premise, I would have to say no. The book states trial by jury and democracy are examples of the way we embrace the rationality premise. An example of the perfectibility premise is good vs. evil. Humans are born into sin but we have the opportunity to do good. The mutability premise can be seen in education. Education is an example of mutability because it stimulates our minds and bodies. Another example could be sports, and dance or yoga because these also stimulate humans physically and psychological. One more example of mutability premise would be conversation, daily conversation helps psychologically and physically because you feel great after a wonderful conversation.

If I were to create different premises, I might write about emotionality premises, power premises, and human interaction premise. Emotionality premise would focus on the way humans react and experience emotions. Many individuals have issues with controlling emotions and understanding what they mean and being emotional is being human as rationality is. Power premise would focus on the humans desire for power and control. What humans do for such power and what it means to them. And the human interaction premise would be the human need for other humans. Touch, conversation, and love would be studied.

I rather believe in these premises than the rationality, perfectibility or mutability premise.
These premises make humans seem so robotic and predictable, but I do not believe in that at all.